ANKARA (DİHA) - The Ankara Aggravated Felony Court 11 started to judge old deputies of DEP again according to the sentence of Cassation 9 Department. However, while the presence of Orhan Karadeniz, the Minister of the Law Court, who signed the old verdict creates a discussion the trial of the deputies who were in the accused statute as convicts attracted the attention.

The case was started to be conducted at the Aggravated Felony Court 11 after the Cassation 9 Department quashed the conviction judgment on a point of law about the old deputies of DEP. DEP old deputies, Hatip Dicle, Leyla Zana, Orhan Doğan, and Selim Sadak, who came to the court to participate the trial waited for a period of time in front of the judgment hall.

' The only thing changed is our going into the front door.'

The deputies told that the abolishment of The State Security Court was just a change of signboard and they added that: "Although 10 years passed there is nothing that was changed. The process server is the same, the court commission is the same, accused are the same...Only the door that we enter changed; We were going into the back door, now from the front door.

'Karadeniz' is in charge of the commission again.'

Yusuf Alataş and Nuri Özmen, the lawyers of the DEP deputies, were present at the court. The chairmanship of the Court Commission was conducted by Mehmet Orhan Karadeniz. While Ismail Tiryaki, one of the old members of the commission, was not participate in the commission, another member Süreyya Gönül told that the presence of her might create lack of confidence among the accused and wanted to withdraw from the commission with an application. However the court rejected this application.

'The verdict is: trial again'

The court commission made the identity control and wrote them on the protocol. It attracted the attention that the head of the court had the position of the deputies written as convicts instead of accused. The court commission reached a verdict of the judgment of the deputies again with the opposition of Karadeniz.

The prosecutor wanted them to be jailed as condemned

The lawyer Alataş, beginning to speak drew attention to the legal changes and stated that the judgment was done in a different conjecture. He reminded of the Supreme Court's using the change of 90.th particle of the Constitution as a base in many cases and criticized the head of the court a she did not note the deputies as condemned on the protocol. He said the decision about his clients changed and a new case started so he requested his clients to be judged as suspects not condemned. He also demanded for time as the judgment restarted to read the indictment and the decision. On the other hand the prosecutor Dilaver Kahveci, resisting on the Supreme Court's documents, demanded them to be judged as condemned and continuance of the judgment as the written copies of the Court's documents were not completed.

"They will be judged as condemned"

The Commission, after a short break, decided unanimously to write the deputies as ' convicts' on the protocol. Then the indictment was read. Finally the commission postponed the case until December for the accused to defend themselves and the witnesses who weren't listened before to tell their addresses.

(va/ba/sy)